In which cities do business records carry a phone number?
Measured as the share of business records with a phone number, Geelong is highest at 60.7% and Nottingham lowest at 7.8%, across 476,921 OpenStreetMap records (extracts up to 11 Nov 2026).
Data © OpenStreetMap contributors, ODbL, extract of 11 Nov 2026. The CSV is under the same licence.
Phone listed
| Name | Records | Phone listed |
|---|---|---|
| Geelong | 1,325 | 60.7% |
| Milwaukee | 2,210 | 60.3% |
| Washington, DC | 3,437 | 58.6% |
| Victoria | 1,034 | 56.7% |
| Salt Lake City | 1,585 | 52.4% |
| Vancouver | 5,682 | 52.0% |
| New York City | 31,355 | 52.0% |
| Atlanta | 2,094 | 50.9% |
| Miami | 885 | 50.3% |
| Boston | 2,598 | 48.0% |
| Orlando | 1,021 | 47.0% |
| St. Louis | 1,246 | 46.9% |
| Minneapolis | 2,082 | 46.2% |
| Calgary | 5,554 | 46.2% |
| Portland | 5,141 | 46.1% |
| Chicago | 8,515 | 45.7% |
| Philadelphia | 3,350 | 45.7% |
| Pittsburgh | 1,495 | 45.2% |
| Seattle | 5,991 | 44.0% |
| Baltimore | 2,547 | 43.9% |
| Tampa | 1,349 | 42.5% |
| Austin | 4,039 | 41.6% |
| Denver | 3,941 | 39.2% |
| Berlin | 29,480 | 38.7% |
| San Francisco | 6,567 | 38.6% |
| Tucson | 1,667 | 38.0% |
| San Diego | 5,105 | 38.0% |
| Columbus | 2,766 | 37.5% |
| New Orleans | 1,376 | 36.5% |
| Gold Coast | 2,584 | 35.9% |
| Raleigh | 1,887 | 35.4% |
| Nashville | 1,772 | 35.2% |
| Paris | 34,582 | 34.7% |
| San Antonio | 3,157 | 34.6% |
| Las Vegas | 1,301 | 34.5% |
| Edinburgh | 5,121 | 33.9% |
| Cork | 1,904 | 33.9% |
| Montreal | 8,301 | 33.8% |
| Christchurch | 2,491 | 33.2% |
| Amsterdam | 7,703 | 33.1% |
| Dallas | 3,789 | 31.8% |
| Los Angeles | 9,165 | 31.1% |
| Cape Town | 3,633 | 30.8% |
| Winnipeg | 2,354 | 30.3% |
| Newcastle upon Tyne | 1,898 | 29.9% |
| Toronto | 17,463 | 29.8% |
| Sacramento | 1,244 | 29.3% |
| Hamilton | 2,311 | 28.9% |
| Albuquerque | 2,301 | 28.9% |
| Hobart | 1,006 | 28.7% |
| Dublin | 5,198 | 28.4% |
| Houston | 5,690 | 27.9% |
| Cardiff | 2,046 | 27.4% |
| Phoenix | 4,764 | 26.9% |
| Kansas City | 2,002 | 26.9% |
| Cambridge | 998 | 26.1% |
| Auckland | 11,612 | 25.4% |
| London | 51,821 | 25.3% |
| Charlotte | 2,915 | 24.6% |
| Canberra | 2,142 | 23.2% |
| Johannesburg | 3,442 | 22.5% |
| Wellington | 1,335 | 22.2% |
| Indianapolis | 2,265 | 22.2% |
| Melbourne | 23,639 | 22.1% |
| Glasgow | 3,360 | 21.2% |
| Regina | 944 | 21.0% |
| San Jose | 4,935 | 20.6% |
| Detroit | 1,617 | 19.9% |
| Edmonton | 3,642 | 19.4% |
| Ottawa | 7,603 | 19.0% |
| Sydney | 18,015 | 18.7% |
| Brisbane | 9,426 | 17.8% |
| Adelaide | 4,766 | 17.2% |
| Leeds | 4,449 | 16.9% |
| Birmingham | 5,804 | 16.7% |
| Singapore | 12,727 | 15.4% |
| Manchester | 3,223 | 14.7% |
| Bristol | 3,612 | 14.1% |
| Leicester | 1,070 | 11.2% |
| Southampton | 1,148 | 11.1% |
| Liverpool | 2,063 | 10.8% |
| Belfast | 1,464 | 10.0% |
| Sheffield | 3,565 | 9.1% |
| Nottingham | 2,215 | 7.8% |
Method
Share of OpenStreetMap business records with a phone, contact:phone or contact:mobile tag, all published lists in each city combined. Cities with fewer than 300 records are left out.
Limits
Only the presence of a number is counted. Numbers are not published on this site.
Cite this study
Phone numbers on the map: city by city. Get a List Of, 11 Nov 2026, from OpenStreetMap data (© OpenStreetMap contributors, ODbL). https://getalistof.com/data-studies/phone-gap-by-city/
Questions
How was this measured?
Share of OpenStreetMap business records with a phone, contact:phone or contact:mobile tag, all published lists in each city combined. Cities with fewer than 300 records are left out.
What should I keep in mind?
Only the presence of a number is counted. Numbers are not published on this site.
Can I reuse the numbers?
Yes. The CSV is a derived OpenStreetMap database under the Open Database License: credit OpenStreetMap contributors and keep changed versions under the same licence.