Which city has the largest website gap?

The city with the largest share of public business records missing a website tag is Singapore, at 83.0% (17.0% list one). Next come Sheffield (82.0%) and Leicester (81.9%). The table covers all 84 cities with at least 5 lists.

Data © OpenStreetMap contributors, ODbL, extract of 11 Nov 2026.

A missing website tag is a gap in the public map record, not proof that the business has no website. Used carefully, the gap is a research signal: it shows where a local web-service or audit offer has the most records to check first.

OpenStreetMap records on the published lists, extracts up to 11 Nov 2026.
RankCityRecordsNo website on the recordWebsite listedPhone listedLists
1Singapore12,72783.0%17.0%15.4%43
2Sheffield3,56582.0%18.0%9.1%42
3Leicester1,07081.9%18.1%11.2%24
4Belfast1,46481.0%19.0%10.0%30
5Regina94479.8%20.2%21.0%25
6Johannesburg3,44278.7%21.3%22.5%32
7Edmonton3,64278.3%21.7%19.4%37
8Ottawa7,60377.8%22.2%19.0%51
9Liverpool2,06377.2%22.8%10.8%31
10Bristol3,61277.0%23.0%14.1%43
11Indianapolis2,26576.9%23.1%22.2%40
12Auckland11,61276.8%23.2%25.4%48
13Brisbane9,42676.6%23.4%17.8%51
14Detroit1,61776.5%23.5%19.9%30
15Southampton1,14876.5%23.5%11.1%27
16Birmingham5,80476.4%23.6%16.7%47
17Adelaide4,76676.3%23.7%17.2%45
18Toronto17,46375.1%24.9%29.8%52
19Cape Town3,63374.8%25.2%30.8%33
20Sydney18,01574.5%25.5%18.7%51
21Hamilton2,31174.1%25.9%28.9%36
22Manchester3,22373.3%26.7%14.7%41
23Nottingham2,21572.6%27.4%7.8%40
24Melbourne23,63972.4%27.6%22.1%54
25Leeds4,44971.9%28.1%16.9%40
26Montreal8,30169.8%30.2%33.8%49
27Houston5,69069.7%30.3%27.9%42
28Phoenix4,76469.6%30.4%26.9%52
29Glasgow3,36069.4%30.6%21.2%38
30Paris34,58269.0%31.0%34.7%55
31Winnipeg2,35468.8%31.2%30.3%39
32San Antonio3,15768.7%31.3%34.6%36
33Albuquerque2,30168.5%31.5%28.9%36
34San Jose4,93568.4%31.6%20.6%50
35Charlotte2,91568.4%31.6%24.6%38
36Los Angeles9,16568.2%31.8%31.1%48
37Hobart1,00667.7%32.3%28.7%25
38Cork1,90467.0%33.0%33.9%36
39Sacramento1,24467.0%33.0%29.3%25
40Canberra2,14266.9%33.1%23.2%34
41Raleigh1,88764.6%35.4%35.4%36
42Las Vegas1,30164.4%35.6%34.5%30
43London51,82164.0%36.0%25.3%55
44Baltimore2,54763.7%36.3%43.9%39
45Cardiff2,04662.6%37.4%27.4%37
46Tucson1,66762.1%37.9%38.0%30
47San Francisco6,56761.2%38.8%38.6%45
48New York City31,35561.0%39.0%52.0%55
49Gold Coast2,58460.9%39.1%35.9%37
50Christchurch2,49160.8%39.2%33.2%37
51Dallas3,78960.8%39.2%31.8%43
52San Diego5,10560.4%39.6%38.0%41
53Columbus2,76659.8%40.2%37.5%38
54Wellington1,33558.4%41.6%22.2%26
55Denver3,94158.3%41.7%39.2%44
56Newcastle upon Tyne1,89858.1%41.9%29.9%30
57Kansas City2,00257.9%42.1%26.9%37
58Dublin5,19857.2%42.8%28.4%46
59Orlando1,02156.8%43.2%47.0%20
60New Orleans1,37655.7%44.3%36.5%22
61St. Louis1,24655.2%44.8%46.9%27
62Pittsburgh1,49554.4%45.6%45.2%28
63Berlin29,48054.3%45.7%38.7%56
64Philadelphia3,35054.2%45.8%45.7%38
65Nashville1,77254.2%45.8%35.2%27
66Miami88552.7%47.3%50.3%17
67Austin4,03952.4%47.6%41.6%41
68Tampa1,34952.2%47.8%42.5%26
69Calgary5,55451.9%48.1%46.2%44
70Edinburgh5,12150.3%49.7%33.9%49
71Chicago8,51547.9%52.1%45.7%45
72Cambridge99846.5%53.5%26.1%25
73Milwaukee2,21046.2%53.8%60.3%37
74Salt Lake City1,58544.0%56.0%52.4%30
75Amsterdam7,70343.0%57.0%33.1%45
76Boston2,59842.7%57.3%48.0%33
77Vancouver5,68242.1%57.9%52.0%44
78Atlanta2,09441.6%58.4%50.9%35
79Victoria1,03440.2%59.8%56.7%27
80Geelong1,32539.8%60.2%60.7%32
81Washington, DC3,43738.0%62.0%58.6%36
82Minneapolis2,08236.8%63.2%46.2%41
83Portland5,14132.4%67.6%46.1%44
84Seattle5,99132.1%67.9%44.0%47

How to read it

The ranking is weighted by every published list page in each city, not by a single category. A city with a small or unusual category mix can move more than a large city with broad coverage.

All rankings

Questions

What does this ranking measure?

The share of OpenStreetMap business records on the published lists that carry a website. It measures the public record, not whether each business really has a website.

How often does it change?

It is rebuilt every time the map extracts are refreshed. This version uses extracts up to 11 Nov 2026.